パークランド銃乱射事件の英雄、犯人の名前を買い取り利用を阻止www

挿話

今日知ったことだが、パークランド銃乱射事件で自分の身を挺してクラスメートをかばった英雄、アンソニー・ボルヘスは、法的に加害者の名前の権利を所有している。これにより、加害者はボルヘスの許可なしにインタビューに応じたり、映画プロデューサーや作家と契約を結んだりすることができなくなった。


コメント

  1. Hog_enthusiast より:

    The son of Sam law would prevent the shooter from profiting from his crimes anyway

  2. grafknives より:

    I stopped your bullet, I now OWN YOU, bitch! 

  3. Kuiriel より:

    This is the photo of the killer. You should have the photo of the hero instead.

    https://www.cmohs.org/citizen-honors/anthony-borges

  4. TimelyConcern より:

    We are allowed to use Faery tricks as punishments now?

  5. my cousin was murdered by a rich guy. his parents are entitled to about $30 million as a result. But damned if the murderer doesn’t continue having no personal assets of his own, thirty years later.

  6. puffinfish420 より:

    That’s not true, I don’t think. I think he needs permission if he is going to *profit* from the name in interviews. He can do an interview or use his name/likeness however he wants as long as he is not making money.

    The right to likeness doesn’t allow a private citizen to control another citizen’s ability to speak, appear on interviews, whatever. If governs the ability to *profit* from that likeness. It’s like a property right, it doesn’t actually control an individuals speech or behavior

  7. Multiamor より:

    I hate law in general but that’s a cool ass added punishment. I’ve always felt like these gun toting wannabes should never get an ounce of attention for the shit they do. Fuck them.

  8. This should just be standard for all shootings. People aren’t allowed to make movies or documentaries or anything without permission and oversight from victims. It should apply to the news as well.

  9. How do you legally own the rights to someone else’s name? 

    Fuck the shooter but that’s insane 

  10. He got shot 5 times I hope there’s a compensation fund in America for victims of crime

  11. revolverzanbolt より:

    Surely a law preventing someone from giving interviews would be unconstitutional on the grounds of free speech?

    Wouldn’t this same law be able to prevent all convicted criminals from ever speaking to the press if the judges added that as a punishment?

  12. TheRequiemRose より:

    This guy looks like he was made with the Oblivion character generator.

  13. Lotus-child89 より:

    These bastards don’t deserve any attention from media outlets, but I do hope there’s reasonably open access to interview them by criminal psychology researchers. Understanding these kinds of people from an academic standpoint could provide invaluable information to work on the prevention of this in the future.

  14. chrispy_exe より:

    The way it’s supposed to work is that if an act is perpetrated against you that is so publicly known and popular, the perpetrator can’t get royalties decades in the future when media corporations inevitably want to milk the story for more cash. Essentially, a court can grant you or your kin the rights to those proceeds instead of your attacker.

  15. trucorsair より:

    Let his name be written in the sand and blown away on the winds of time such that no memory of him remains to be worshipped by those that would.

  16. Microtonicwave より:

    Fun fact my legal name is Nicholas Cruz. When this happened I got a ton of messages on Facebook from people thinking it was me. Pretty wild. Needless to say, I will never become as infamous as him

  17. occamsrzor より:

    The fuck?

    So…exactly what conditions are required to non-person someone?

  18. hinterstoisser より:

    This reminds me of the Christchurch (NZ) shooting in 2019 when Jacinda Ardern said this in parliament- his (shooter’s) name shall not be spoken and give him any more publicity.

  19. hypermarv123 より:

    Fuck this shooter guy I’m glad I forgot his name.

  20. Type_9 より:

    FYI the pic is of the parkland shooter, not Anthony Borges. Just didn’t want anyone to think that that piece of shit in the photo is a hero.

  21. Pet_Velvet より:

    I love how I don’t even know the shooter’s name, that’s how much of a loser he is

  22. Why tf is this post showing the shooters face and not the hero

  23. FeelTheWrath79 より:

    Is this what is known as a pro-gamer move?

  24. greatgrattitude より:

    Thumbnail is the shooter, not Borges, which ia confusing.

  25. sabby55 より:

    That is a fucking brilliant move

  26. I fucking hate Cruz’ stupid face. He looks like an evil gremlin through and through.

  27. Fat_flounder より:

    Why give this pos exposure? His face should be forgotten. Should’ve posted a pic of the hero instead.

    This is good to know though. I’ve been thinking about this creep for some reason lately, wishing I could reverse time and magically wipe him from existence to prevent this tragedy from ever happening. I guess this is realistically the next best thing.

  28. swefnes_woma より:

    I have no idea what the name of the Parkland shooter is and I think that’s how it ought to be

  29. notdbcooper71 より:

    How did he get the rights to his name?

  30. TheCrayTrain より:

    What if he just changed his name or went with an alias?

  31. NKD_WA より:

    Can anyone explain to me what the killer gets out of this deal? The article doesn’t seem to say. He’s sitting in prison, it’s not like he was risking losing his house and car by not settling, and no court would have ordered donating his brain or taking away his rights to his own name or forbid him from giving interviews. (Clear 1st amendment violations)

  32. koshercowboy より:

    Thanks for making us all look at the shooters face.

  33. pureteckle より:

    Why would anyone want to interview or make a film about this piece of shite in the first place? What’s the point of this ruling? 

    He’s serving multiple life sentences, I don’t think he has to worry about what he’s going to get up to when he’s out. 

  34. [Someone read the comment from the other post of the Parkland Shooting hero Anthony Borges.](https://www.reddit.com/r/nextfuckinglevel/s/Brnksa48NF)

  35. gobrocker より:

    lol he or his lawyer must be a legend!

  36. Is this the imbecile who was pretending to hear demonic voices?

  37. hotstepper77777 より:

    From what I know about other cases, This also probably means he cant ever get commisary in prison until he’s paid victim’s restitution and fines, and he can’t sell his story or name to pay them off faster. He has nothing and will have nothing to look forward to or break up the monotony. No food but the slop the cafeteria serves. 

  38. It was a failure of the Justice system that the killer did not get the chair

  39. Curious if… Borges… can make money off of his name…

    Son of Sam laws and all…

  40. tomato_johnson より:

    Couldn’t he just change his name

  41. fonk_pulk より:

    Wait, how does that work? Like how is it legal to force someone to forfeit the use of their own name like that?

  42. Mr_Baronheim より:

    Can he just give interviews without giving his name?

    If it turns out someone else legally owns the McDonald’s name, they’re not gonna suddenly stop all production and cease to exist.

    Can he just go as PoppinBoi3000 or something?

  43. moicest_adele より:

    Powerful move. Justice in action.

  44. Anthony Borges out there taking names

  45. Kindly-Ad-5071 より:

    What?

  46. LAURV3N より:

    How can this monster’s face be removed?