ブレオナ・テイラー事件:元警官に禁錮3年、司法省の刑務所回避要請を却下

トレンド

はい、承知いたしました。
以下に、SNSでバズるようにリライトしたブログ記事を作成しました。


【速報】ブリアナ・テイラー事件、元警官に禁錮刑!司法判断と市民の怒り 🔥



ブリアナ・テイラー

1. 事件の概要:再び注目が集まるブリアナ・テイラー事件

2020年、アメリカ社会を揺るがしたブリアナ・テイラー射殺事件。

この事件で過剰な武力行使をしたとして告発された元警官、ブレット・ハンキンソンに対し、ついに判決が下されました。

2. 判決内容:禁錮33ヶ月の実刑判決

ケンタッキー州の連邦裁判所は、ハンキンソンに対し禁錮33ヶ月の実刑判決を言い渡しました。

司法省が求刑をしないという異例の展開の中、裁判官は「刑務所に入らないのは不適切」と判断。

この判決は、昨年11月の陪審の評決を軽視するものだと批判しました。

3. なぜ今、この事件が重要なのか?: Black Lives Matter運動の象徴

ブリアナ・テイラー事件は、黒人女性の命が軽視されている現実を浮き彫りにし、Black Lives Matter(BLM)運動の大きなきっかけとなりました。

この事件を機に、アメリカ全土で警察の暴力に対する抗議運動が激化。

日本でも多くの人がこの問題に関心を寄せ、SNS上での議論が活発化しました。

4. 判決に対する反応:司法への不信感と失望の声

今回の判決に対し、ブリアナ・テイラーの遺族を支援する弁護士のベン・クランプは、刑期が短いことに不満を示しつつも、「少なくとも彼が刑務所に行くこと、そしてブリアナ・テイラーのことを3年間考えることを期待する」とコメントしました。

しかし、多くの市民からは「司法は本当に正義を実現できるのか?」という失望と怒りの声が上がっています。

5. 事件の背景:複雑に絡み合う問題

事件当日、ハンキンソンは10発もの銃弾を発砲しましたが、いずれも命中しませんでした。

彼は、この事件で起訴された唯一の警官であり、今回の判決が初めての実刑判決となります。

事件の背景には、警察の過剰な武力行使、人種差別、そして司法制度の問題など、多くの要素が複雑に絡み合っています。

6. 今後の展望:真の justice(正義)は実現できるのか?

今回の判決は、ブリアナ・テイラー事件の終結を意味するものではありません。

むしろ、この事件を教訓に、警察改革、人種差別の解消、そして司法制度の改善に向けた取り組みを加速させる必要があります。

私たち一人ひとりがこの問題に関心を持ち続け、行動することで、より公正な社会を実現できるはずです。

7. まとめ:私たちにできること

ブリアナ・テイラー事件は、私たちに多くのことを教えてくれます。

他人事ではなく、自分自身の問題として捉え、何ができるのかを考え、行動することが大切です。

SNSでの情報発信、デモへの参加、署名活動への協力など、私たちにできることはたくさんあります。

#JusticeForBreonnaTaylor

#BlackLivesMatter

#ブリアナ・テイラー


この記事を読んで、あなたはどう感じましたか?
ぜひコメントやシェアであなたの意見を聞かせてください!



Louisville, Kentucky
AP
 — 

A federal judge on Monday sentenced a former Kentucky police officer to nearly three years in prison for using excessive force during the deadly 2020 Breonna Taylor raid, rebuffing a US Department of Justice recommendation of no prison time for the defendant.

Brett Hankison, who fired 10 shots during the raid but didn’t hit anyone, was the only officer on the scene charged in the Black woman’s death. He is the first person sentenced to prison in the case that rocked the city of Louisville and spawned weeks of street protests over police brutality that year.

US District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings, in sentencing Hankison, said no prison time “is not appropriate” and would minimize the jury’s verdict from November. Jennings said she was “startled” there weren’t more people injured in the raid from Hankison’s blind shots.

She sentenced Hankison, 49, to 33 months in prison for the conviction of use of excessive force with three years of supervised probation to follow the prison term. He will not report directly to prison. The US Bureau of Prisons will determine where and when he starts his sentence, Jennings said.

The judge, who presided over two of Hankison’s trials, expressed disappointment with a sentencing recommendation by federal prosecutors last week, saying the Justice Department was treating Hankison’s actions as “an inconsequential crime” and said some of its arguments were “incongruous and inappropriate.”

Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who helped Taylor’s family secure a $12 million wrongful death settlement against the city of Louisville, had called the department’s recommendation “an insult to the life of Breonna Taylor and a blatant betrayal of the jury’s decision.”

Crump was at Monday’s hearing and said he had hoped for a longer sentence but was “grateful that (Hankison) is at least going to prison and has to think for those 3 years about Breonna Taylor and that her life mattered.”

Afterward, before a crowd outside the courthouse, Crump sounded a familiar chant: “Say Her name.” The crowd yelled back: “Breonna Taylor!” And he and other members of Taylor family’s legal team issued a subsequent statement criticizing the Justice Department.

A photo of Breonna Taylor provided by Attorney Ben Crump.

“While today’s sentence is not what we had hoped for –– nor does it fully reflect the severity of the harm caused –– it is more than what the Department of Justice sought. That, in itself, is a statement,” the statement said.

Hankison’s 10 shots the night of the March 2020 botched drug raid flew through the walls of Taylor’s apartment into a neighboring apartment, narrowly missing a neighboring family.

The 26-year-old’s death, along with the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, sparked racial injustice and police brutality protests nationwide that year.

But the Justice Department, under new leadership since President Donald Trump took office in January, sought no prison time for Hankison, in an abrupt about-face by federal prosecutors after the department spent years prosecuting the former detective. They suggested time already served, which amounted to one day, and three years of supervised probation.

Taylor’s mother, Tamika Palmer, said she was disappointed that the new federal prosecutors assigned to the case were not pushing for a tougher sentence. On many occasions inside the courtroom Monday, lead federal prosecutor Rob Keenan agreed with Hankison’s defense attorneys on factors that would decrease Hankison’s punishment.

“There was no prosecution in there for us,” Palmer said afterward. “Brett had his own defense team, I didn’t know he got a second one.”

Taylor was shot in her hallway by two officers after her boyfriend fired from inside the apartment, striking an officer in the leg. Neither of the other officers was charged in state or federal court after prosecutors deemed they were justified in returning fire into the apartment. Louisville police used a drug warrant to enter Taylor’s apartment, but found no drugs or cash inside.

A separate jury deadlocked on federal charges against Hankison in 2023, and he was acquitted on state charges of wanton endangerment in 2022.

In their recent sentencing memo, federal prosecutors wrote that though Hankison’s “response in these fraught circumstances was unreasonable given the benefit of hindsight, that unreasonable response did not kill or wound Breonna Taylor, her boyfriend, her neighbors, defendant’s fellow officers, or anyone else.”

Jennings acknowledged Monday that officers were provoked by Taylor’s boyfriend’s gunshot, but said “that does not allow officers to then do what they want and then be excused.”

While the hearing was going on, Louisville police arrested four people in front of the courthouse who it said were “creating confrontation, kicking vehicles, or otherwise creating an unsafe environment.” Authorities didn’t list charges against them.

Federal prosecutors had argued that multiple factors — including that Hankison’s two other trials ended with no convictions — should greatly reduce the potential punishment. They also argued he would be susceptible to abuse in prison and suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder.

The sentencing memorandum was submitted by Harmeet Dhillon, chief of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and a Trump political appointee who in May moved to cancel settlements with Louisville and Minneapolis that had called for overhauling their police departments.

In the Taylor case, three other ex-Louisville police officers have been charged with crafting a falsified warrant, but have not gone to trial. None were at the scene when Taylor was shot. The warrant used to enter her apartment was one of five issued that night in search of evidence on an alleged drug dealer that Taylor once had an association with.




コメント